In the mouth, ther'es a real savory edge to the tannins, some supporting acidity (almost too little; it's almost flabby), a kind of dark, dour note that I can't place, a fair amount of sucrosité, and then a sort of nondescript finish that really doesn't go anywhere before fading out on a sort of Kendal mint cake sweetness that I'm frankly not a fan of.
With more time and air, it started to taste like pink popcorn balls or perhaps even Luden cough drops; all bright, neon pink fruit, signifying nothing.
All in all, I'm not really sure what I'm supposed to make of this. Compared to the Chris Ringland variants on the style (huge, alcoholic Shiraz from South Australia), this seems less rich, less complex, just plain less. What this wine needs is some bacon fat, some toasty, charred barrel notes, some violets or perfume - anything to offset the huge, hulking, bland sweetness of it all.
Color me unimpressed.
Mollydooker
Price: US $20
Closure: Stelvin
Date tasted: January 2008
What a shame, especially as I know you have enjoyed several Mollydookers in the past. From your note, this one sounds really unbalanced.
I don't get the Shiraz at all. The Blue Eyed Boy shiraz was pretty freakin' awesome (had that at Mozza in LA last year), and I had a bottle of the Carnival of Points, er, Love about a year ago that was mind-bending, but their regular shiraz? Not a big fan. It's clownish, at least to me.
I still love their cheap Merlot, though. Go figure.